I wrote a piece on the Ebola outbreak for Salon.com.

For more, follow this link.

Here is an excerpt:

The United States, according to the CDC, has sent a seven-person team to help in Guinea, and provided protective clothing and equipment for healthcare workers in all three countries. In the grand scheme of things, that is a minimal amount of aid – echoed by the minimal coverage the outbreak has garnered in U.S. media. (Far more attention was afforded GOP Congressman Phil Gingrey’s outlandish and factually implausible comments about refugee children crossing the border bringing Ebola into the United States from Central America.)

Another good thing about this medicine is that it is available in almost all pharmacies under prescription. cialis super viagra an active ingredient that retains or preserves the high level of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in the body. Logon the viagra in the uk website and explore wide information on prominent prescription ED medicines. So, they invest more millions in levitra low cost establishing the brand and start selling at the highest price the market will stand. Batur was quite exhausting but as we got higher and left the treeline we could see the outline of the summit against the stars and that energised us even more. tadalafil 20mg for sale There is more than one way to interpret America’s disinterest. One is racism — the sense that the people dying of Ebola are so different from “us” that we really can’t identify with them. Another is compassion fatigue. Isn’t there always some horrible disease afflicting Africa and Africans?

Indeed, many of the English–language articles that have been written about the Ebola outbreak focus on “ignorant” and “superstitious” Africans who give more credence to witchcraft than to modern medicine.

 

For another post of interest, follow this link:  The Medicalization of the Death and Other Penalties